Look, I have made a thingy!

2019-05-19T00:00:00+00:00

An applicative instance for lists.

QuickCheck is a library for testing of program properties. It can tests the specified properties hold for a large number of randomly generated cases. When a counterexample is found, QuickCheck also tries to “shrink” the counterexample to a minimal one. The generation and shrinking of values is controlled through the Arbitrary type class.

I while ago I was implementing a shrink for a data structure with additional invariants and I needed a way to “push” a particular shrink function (of type a -> [a]) inside a nested structure and “pull the results out” correctly.

Let me explain. I will use m :: Map k a as an example.

The default implementation of shrink for Map k a acts on both the keys and the values. In my case I wanted to only act on the values and do so with a special shrink function myShrink :: a -> [a] I had written.

Map k has a Traversable instance, so my first thought, purely inspired by the types, was to write:

traverse myShrink m

This has the desired type [Map k a] but, it turns out, the result is not what I expected!

Shrinking

The QuickCheck documentation has a few paragraphs describing how to implement correctly the function shrink for your Arbitrary instance.

What follow is an extract from the documentation of Arbitrary.

Most implementations of shrink should try at least three things:

Shrink a term to any of its immediate subterms. You can use subterms to do this.

Recursively apply shrink to all immediate subterms. You can use recursivelyShrink to do this.

Type-specific shrinkings such as replacing a constructor by a simpler constructor.

For example, suppose we have the following implementation of binary trees:
data Tree a = Nil | Branch a (Tree a) (Tree a)
We can then define shrink as follows:
shrink Nil = []
shrink (Branch x l r) =
  -- shrink Branch to Nil
  [Nil] ++
  -- shrink to subterms
  [l, r] ++
  -- recursively shrink subterms
  [Branch x' l' r' | (x', l', r') <- shrink (x, l, r)]
There are a couple of subtleties here:

QuickCheck tries the shrinking candidates in the order they appear in the list, so we put more aggressive shrinking steps (such as replacing the whole tree by Nil) before smaller ones (such as recursively shrinking the subtrees).

It is tempting to write the last line as
[Branch x' l' r' | x' <- shrink x, l' <- shrink l,
                   r' <- shrink r]
but this is the wrong thing! It will force QuickCheck to shrink x, l and r in tandem, and shrinking will stop once one of the three is fully shrunk.

The meaning of “in tandem” in the last sentence was a bit vague for me so I had to unpack it a little bit to understand what the point was.

Let’s forget about the node value x and assume shrinking l and r gives three values each.

shrink l = [l1, l2, l3]
shrink r = [r1, r2, r3]

What the last sentence above is saying is that the shrink function should not produce the sequence

[ Branch l1 r1
, Branch l1 r2
, Branch l1 r3
, Branch l2 r1
, Branch l2 r2
, Branch l2 r3
, Branch l3 r1
, Branch l3 r2
, Branch l3 r3
]

but instead

[ Branch l r1
, Branch l r3
, Branch l r3
, Branch l1 r
, Branch l2 r
, Branch l3 r
]

I can only guess that by “in tandem” the authors of QuickCheck meant terms where both sides are shrunk (e.g. Branch l2 r3).

The desired behaviour is hidden in the shrink implementation for tuples, that is in shrink (l, r). Indeed:

λ> import Test.QuickCheck
λ> shrink 'd'
"abc"
λ> shrink ('d', 'd')
[('a','d'),('b','d'),('c','d'),('d','a'),('d','b'),('d','c')]

Looking for the applicative

The Applicative instance for [] is the monadic one, which makes traverse myShrink behave similarly to the list comprehension mentioned in the QuickCheck documentation.

This led me to think there might be a more suitable applicative instance for lists, different from the monadic and the zipper ones.

Thingy

newtype Thingy a = Thingy { unThingy :: [a] }
  deriving (Eq, Show, Functor)

λ> mapM_ print $ unThingy . sequenceA $ (Thingy . shrink) <$> m
fromList [(1,'a'),(2,'d')]
fromList [(1,'b'),(2,'d')]
fromList [(1,'c'),(2,'d')]
fromList [(1,'d'),(2,'a')]
fromList [(1,'d'),(2,'b')]
fromList [(1,'d'),(2,'c')]

actually

λ> mapM_ print $ tail . unThingy . sequenceA $ (\x -> Thingy . (x:) $ shrink x) <$> m

instance Applicative Thingy where

  pure x = Thingy [x]

  (Thingy _ ) <*> (Thingy []) = Thingy []
  (Thingy []) <*> (Thingy _ ) = Thingy []

  (Thingy (f:fs)) <*> (Thingy (x:xs))
    = Thingy $ f x : [ f' x | f' <- fs ] ++ [ f x | x <- xs ]

Andrea Bedini - Blog

Look, I have made a thingy!

Shrinking

Looking for the applicative

Thingy